ForumForUs - Andalusia - The Songlines - SwordsDublin.com - Wicklow - South County Dublin - Dogs

If you log in now, you can:
- post forum messages
- vote on messages
- filter messages

Visit our forum!
DonabatePortrane.com
Donabate
Portrane
About us
Our schools
Community Groups
Sport
Local businesses
Chamber of Commerce
Property
Photographs
Kids' Stuff
Sign our Visitors Book
Useful links
Map of Donabate
Messageboard
Site map

Donabate and Portrane Discussion Forum

There are 4 pages in this topic. Select page: 1 2 3 4

From:	lojoke
Posted:	4 February 2010

Jimcorr.com

Actually there was plenty of aircraft wreckage found including, the black boxes, parts of the nose cone and fuselage, airplane tyres, seats, bodies among other things.

As for the cctv, there was plenty but most of it was seized by the authorities and hasn't been released yet (like many issues involving national security it never will be). Like I said its obvious that all the questions haven't been answered but some of the conspiracy theories are laughable. Back in 2002 I actually ran a website about the conspiracy theories which is now gone. I started out believing the worst and through extensive research I believe I now know most of the truth of what happened.

And the controlled demolition theory... http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/466.pdf is one of many papers on the subject

From:	ejb
Posted:	4 February 2010

Jimcorr.com

cool stuff lojoke.

From:	snapper
Posted:	4 February 2010

Jimcorr.com

lojoke I had a look at the papers you linked

Thanks

This might interest you
but

get a coffee it could be a long read I found it after reading your link and thinking speed is the key

I love this 911 stuff !

http://lauraknightjadczyk.blogsome.com/2007/11/10/keith-seffens-wtc-collapse-folly-not-even-wrong/

From:	lojoke
Posted:	4 February 2010

Jimcorr.com

Thanks snapper! I had read a few counter arguments to the one I posted, none quite so eloquent as that one! It is like so many of the theories and ideas about what happened, it doesn't have all the answers. It is like a lot of the conspiracy theories that focus purely on one element of the collapse without looking at the bigger picture.

I would advise everyone to read as much as they can about the subject and make up their own minds. Peer reviewed papers do have their problems, but they are probably the best and most reliable sources of information on the subject at hand.

It can make for some tough reading, with plenty of pseudo scientific bullshit! the Loose Change video is informative... if only to show how research of a subject can be twisted to say whatever it is you wish to say!

From:	snapper
Posted:	4 February 2010

Jimcorr.com

Hi again lojoke

I read through your linked paper and I am no way maths based or scienced based but even I could see the paper was flawed it was just wrong on a lot of things IMO speed been the main one I could see

I used google typed in

journal of engineering mechanics ﾩ asce / march 2007

which was something I C-P from the site you linked

and found my last posted link and read it

I have from day 1 always felt and said 911 was a farce for the want of a better word.

I was almost cured it was almost an addiction I read everthing and the more I read the more I was convinced and I still am that the truth has to come out,

Hollywood could'nt make this stuff up there was so much happening on the day it was mind blowing,

I have laughed hard at time when I read stuff to the point that I pissed of my american friends who now tell me that they know they have;nt heard the truth on what happened on the day but it would be to painful for them to even concider it may have been a falseflag etc they have kids fighting a war because of it.

There is just too many flaws to in the story
planes in the washington airspace and been allowed to hit the Pentagon was one that struck me, and finding terrorist passports in the rubble and reported dead terrorist still alive and well building 7 I could go on but I swear I get a brain freeze thinking about it all,

feic j Corr he has me started again !!
I;ll respect your opinion as you have mine..Thanks

From:	lojoke
Posted:	4 February 2010

Jimcorr.com

Chances are snapper you probably stumbled across my old website at one time or another so. It was active from Feb 2002 till sometime in early 2006. It was purely an informational site. I posted all the available information and advised people to come to their own conclusion. After reading everything I did I came to the conclusion that it was screw up after screw up after covered up screw up.

As someone who works in the aviation industry, and having spent time working in the states with the FAA it isn't that difficult for me to believe that as a result of mixups between civil and military controllers that planes were sent in the wrong direction. There were thousands of flights in the air at the time of the attacks. It was an amazing feat to get all the non-hijacked planes on the ground without more loss of life.

As I've said, there are very legitimate concerns that the full truth has yet to emerge, and in reality it probably never will. Some of the conspiracy theories bandied about are easily refuted with the evidence at hand, others are a lot more difficult. Both sides are guilty of seeing things coloured to their perspective which is entirely understandable.

Anyhoo, that'll be my last post on the subject of 9/11. I could go on all year about it but would get absolutely nowhere.

From:	snapper
Posted:	5 February 2010

Jimcorr.com

I hear you Lojoke, maybe some day in the future the whole truth will come out until them I wish Jc and the others luck, in getting to the bottom of it, interesting you had a dedicated site to the world changing event.

From:	lojoke
Posted:	6 February 2010

Jimcorr.com

Ah yes, back in my geeky computer nerd days!

There are 4 pages in this topic. Select page: 1 2 3 4

You can find more messages on ForumForUs.com

Malahide - Portmarnock - Contact us - Disclaimer